In the argument about work-at-home policies, does the support acknowledge what’s good about previous and current practices? Note that strong support acknowledges and then logically explains away any opposition simply by offering stronger logical evidence on one side than the other. Just offering one reason with its accompanying evidence, that standardization would increase employee retention, is not sufficient support in itself. If the text’s main idea is that new work-at-home policies need to become standardized within specific professions, the support needs to include many different reasons why, and each reason why should have its own supporting evidence. When you decide to analyze a text, and when you determine the pieces (content, language, structure) on which to focus the analysis, ask and answer additional analytical questions. You may want to analyze the text for language, though, to see how an author uses language to accomplish her purpose. Writing that entertains does not necessarily have to be either logical or complete in order to accomplish its purpose. If the purpose is to entertain, then you may or may not need to analyze the text for its content.You may analyze the text in terms of its structure as well, since information placement can influence its importance and how that information is perceived.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |